Abstract

Summary
Our aim in this work was to identify the effect of nepotism in the workplace on turn-over intention, job satisfaction, and job performance of the employees of the General Directorate and departments of youth and sports in the city of Tehran. 179 people were selected as the sample, and answered the questions of the research questionnaires. The findings showed that nepotism had a positive and significant effect on the turn-over intention. Also the effect of nepotism on job satisfaction and job performance of the staff was negative and significant.
Introduction
In today's world, the organizations have realized that their most important assets are human resources, which are an important factor involved in the success and development of any organization, and no organization will be able to achieve all its goals without it. Today, the major problem for most organizations, especially in the developing countries, is not a shortage of raw materials, energy or even technology; rather, they are issues that directly or indirectly relate to the human resource management. One of the most important issues that the organizations face is employing relatives, acquaintances, friends, and people who have been commissioned and supported in the organizations, called nepotism. This variable can disrupt the performance of human resource management in the organization, and consequently, the efficiency and productivity of the organizations will be affected by affecting important organizational variables such as job satisfaction, willingness to leave the job, and job performance of the employees.
Methodology and Approach
The present work was a descriptive survey. The statistical population of the work was the employees of General Directorate and departments of the youth and sports in the city of Tehran (336), 179 of which were randomly selected. The Bute (2011), Bobin, Boles (2004), and Kaman (1997) questionnaires were used for measuring the research variables. For data analysis and identification of the effects of the research variables, the structural equation modeling was used by the LISREL software.
 
Results and Conclusion
The findings showed that nepotism had a positive and significant effect on the turn-over intention of the staff. Also the effect of nepotism on job satisfaction and job performance of the staff was negative and significant. In general, it can be stated that favoritism in workplace is an unprofessional and unethical phenomenon, and it can affect the effectiveness, efficiency, and overall performance of the organization.

Keywords

Abdalla, F. H., Maghrabi, S., & Raggad, G. B. (1998). Assessing the effect of nepotism on human resource managers toward nepotism a cross cultural study. International Journal of Manpower, 19(8), 554-570.
Abtahi, H. (2001). Human resource management. Second edition, Tehran: Payame Noor University Publishing. (Persian)
 Azadi, R., & Eydi, H. (2015). The Effects of Social Capital and Job Satisfaction on Employee Performance with Organizational Commitment Mediation Role (Case Study, Youth and Sports Ministry). Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies, 2(8), 11-24. (Persian)
AL-shawawreh, T. B. (2016). Economic Effects of Using Nepotism and Cronyism in the Employment Process in the Public Sector Institutions. Research in Applied Economics, 8(1), 58-67.
Altindag, E. (2014). Evaluation of nepotism as accelerating effect on employee performance. Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 3(7), 97-104.
Arasli, H., Bavik, A., Ekiz, E. H. (2006).The effects of nepotism on human resource management: The case of three, four- and five-star hotels in Northern Cyprus. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26(7/8), 295-308.
Baranham, L. (2005). Seven Reasons Employees Leave, business review, 22(3),1-10.
Bute, M. (2011). the Effects of Nepotism and Favoritism on Employee Behaviors and Human Resources Practices: A Research on Turkish Public Banks. TODAIES Review of Public Administration, 5(1), 185-208.
Dennis R. L., & Mary L. W. (2003). Nepotisms effect on employee satisfaction and organizational commitment: An empirical study, International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 3(3), 191-202.
Eskildsen, J., Kristensen, K., & Gjesing Antvor, H. (2010). The relationship between job satisfaction and national culture. The TQM Journal, 22(4), 369-378.
Hoctor, A. (2102). Nepotism & HRM practices - How they affect player satisfaction: A Study of G.A.A Clubs. Master's thesis, National College of Ireland, 11-27.
Homan, H. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling With LISREL Application. Tehran: Samt Publishing. (Persian)
Laker, D., & Williams, M. (2003). Nepotism's effect on employee satisfaction and organizational commitment: an empirical study. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 3(3), 191-202.
Lutchman, C. (2008). Leadership Impact on Turnover among Power Engineers in the Oil Sands of Alberta. Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Business Administration. University of Phoenix.
Motowidlo, J. S. (2003). Job Performance, Handbook of Psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12, 39-55.
Rezaian, A. (2011). Fundamentals of Organization and Management. 15th publication, Tehran: Samt Publishing. (Persian)
Singh, P., & Twalo, T. (2014). Impact of Human Factors on the Labor Process: A Case Study. International business and Economic Research Journal, 13(2), 305-318.
Spector, P. E. (2008). Industrial organizational psychology. 5th ed, John Wiley& Sons Inc, 237.
 Zamini, S., &  Hosseini Nasab, D. (2010). A Study Relationship between Organizational Culture and Job Satisfaction among Professorates and Employees in Tabriz University. Organizational culture management, 7(20), 121-138. (Persian)