Abstract

Summary
Considering the special nature of university sport events and specific target group participating in the event, managing the volunteers in such events needs to have certain characteristics and meet special needs. The volunteer managers are encouraged to implement Human Resource (HR) practices and models including Human Resource Architecture (HRA) model in working with the volunteers (1). In order to do so, identifying the components affecting the volunteer HRA model will increase the efficiency and effectiveness of volunteer management in the university sport events.
Introduction
Volunteers make up a key component of the human resources, and play a critical role in organizing the university sport events (2). The increasing emphasis on the professional management of volunteers suggests that the human resource management approaches and models have the potential to influence the volunteering outcomes (3). Therefore, implementation of the human resource architecture (HRA) model is recommended in order to help the volunteer managers to achieve the required combination of volunteers with different abilities, interests, and skills (4). Applying such a model for volunteer management requires identifying all the components and factors that can affect the volunteer HRA model, and determine its effectiveness in volunteer management (5).
Methodology and Approach
This study was a field-research in terms of the data collection methods, and fundamental and applied according to the application. The studied population was the experts in the field of human resource management, volunteering, and university sports, and 19 people were selected as the research sample participating in the research work. The data was collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews. The validity of the research work was confirmed by showing the process of analyzing the interviews to the experts and research reliability in terms of methodology and content; the accuracy of different aspects of research from collection to data analysis was investigated by asking two experts in the field who had no connection to the research work. By their confirmation on the procedures and methods of collecting and interpreting the data, the research audit was approved.
Results and Conclusion
Based on the interviews’ findings, 84 initial codes were obtained, and divided into five main categories including human resource management architecture drivers, human resource management architecture elements, human resource architecture development barriers, human resource architecture strategic systems, and human resource management architecture functions. The results obtained show that implementing the human resource architecture model in managing the volunteers in the university sports events, through the optimal knowledge of the elements and drivers of volunteer human resource architecture, by using the related strategic systems and trying to overcome the barriers in the development of the volunteer HRA model could lead to the achievement of volunteer human resource architecture functions for event stakeholders. Eventually, by maintaining the motivation and commitment of the volunteers, the process of socialization of the volunteers would be facilitated; they would have sufficient expertise and would feel valuable. On the other hand, the findings showed that by improving the performance of the volunteers, the efficiency and effectiveness of the event could be increased, and a more favorable experience of the event would be provided to the participants in the event (including the athletes, coaches, spectators, etc.).

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Chelladurai P, Kerwin S. Human Resource Management in Sport and Recreation. Third edition, Human Kinetics. 2017.
  2. Howes J. Qualitative Study of Sport Event Volunteer Management [dissertation]. University of Northern Colorado; 2016.
  3. Taylor T, Doherty A, McGraw P. Managing People in Sport Organizations: A strategic human resource management perspective. Second Edition, London (GB): Routledge;
  4. Kim E. A systematic review of motivation of sport event volunteers, World Leisure Journal. 2018; 60(4):306-329.
  5. Rozmiarek M, Poczta J, Malchrowicz E. Motivations of Sports Volunteers at the 2023 European Games in Poland. Journal of Sustainability. 2021; 13(11):1-14.
  6. Bang H. Volunteer age, job satisfaction, and intention to stay: A case of non-profit sport organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 2015; 36(2):161-176.
  7. Benson AM, Wise International Sports Volunteering. First edition. London (GB): Routledge. 2017.
  8. Holmes K, Lockstone-Binney L, Smith KA, Shipway R. The Routledge Handbook of Volunteering in Events, Sport and Tourism. First Edition. London (GB): Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 2021.
  9. Cho H, Li C, Wu Y. Understanding sport event volunteers’ continuance intention: An environmental psychology approach. Sport Management Review. 2019; 23(4): 615-625.
  10. Ranjan W, Abeysinghe C, Vitharane S. Sport Voluntarism: Indicators of Sport Volunteers' Satisfaction and Motivation. European Journal of Business and Management. 2021; 13(6):195-216.
  11. Warner S, Newland BL, Green BC. More than Motivation: Reconsidering Volunteer Management Tools. Journal of Sport Management. 2011; 25(5):291-407.
  12. Masterman G. Strategic Sports Event Management: An International Approach. Third edition. London (GB): 2014.
  13. Lachance EL, Parent MM. The volunteer experience in a para-sport event: an autoethnography. Journal of sport management, 2020; 34(2):93-102.
  14. Angosto S, Díaz-Suárez A, López-Gullón JM. Motivation and satisfaction in university sports volunteering. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2021; 18(1):1-13.
  15. Ahmadi M. Investigating the Impact of Human Resource Architecture on the Productivity of Bushehr Tax Administration Staff [Master’s thesis]. Payame Noor University of Shiraz; 2016. (Persian).
  16. Salimifard K, Javidkaram M, Mohammadizade Z. An analytical model for measuring the factors affecting the organization's human resource architecture. Journal of Human resource management research. 2018; 10(4):133-158. (Persian).
  17. SeyedNaghavi M, Ghasemi H. Human Resources Architecture Model. Tehran: Allameh Tabataba’I University Jahad Publications; 2011. (Persian).
  18. Alfes K, Antunes B, Shantz AD. The management of volunteers – what can human resources do? A review and research agenda. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2017; 28(1):62-97.
  19. Newton C, Becker K, Bell S. Learning and development opportunities as a tool for the retention of volunteers: A motivational perspective. Human Resource Management 2014; 24:514–530.
  20. Allen JB, Bartle M. Sport event volunteers' engagement: management matters. Journal of Managing Leisure. 2014; 19(1):36-50.

21.       Kang M. Moderating effects of identification on volunteer engagement. Journal of Communication Management. 2016; 20(2):102-117.

  1. Gould M. Directing and Managing Volunteers. Research Starters: Business (Online Edition). 2015; 1-6.
  2. Allison L, Okun M, Dutridge K. Assessing volunteer motives: A comparison of an open-ended probe and Likert rating scales. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 2002; 12(4):243–255.
  3. Nichols G, Hogg E, Knight C, Storr R. Selling volunteering or developing volunteers? Approaches to promoting sports volunteering. Voluntary Sector Review. 2019; 10(1):3-18.
  4. Chelladurai P. Human resource management in sport and recreation. Illinois: Human Kinetics. 2006.

26.       Kim E, Fredline L, Cuskelly G. Heterogeneity of sport event volunteer motivations: A segmenttion approach. Journal of Tourism Management. 2018; 68:375-386.

  1. Bakhshnia M.The effect of role ambiguity on the intention of re-attending sports event volunteers with the mediating role of satisfaction [Master’s Thesis].Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences: Shahid Rajaei University; 2020. (Persian).
  2. Garner JT, Garner LT. Volunteering an opinion: Organizational voice and volunteer retention in nonprofit organizations. Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2011; 40(5):813-828.
  3. Bopota O, Loukovitis A, Politi V, Barkoukis V. Beliefs of Greek Sport Volunteers about Their Competencies in Volunteering. Physical Education, Sport and Kinesiotherapy Journal. 2020; 59(3):312-321.
  4. Aisbett L, Randle E, Kappelides P. Future volunteer intentions at a major sport event. Annals of Leisure Research. 2015; 18(4):491-509.
  5. Koutrou N, Pappous AS, and Johnson A. Post-Event Volunteering Legacy: Did the London 2012 Games Induce a Sustainable Volunteer Engagement. Journal of Sustainability. 2016; 8(12):12-21.
  6. Sinha M. Volunteering in Canada, 2004 to 2013: Spotlight on Canadians: Results from the General Social Survey. Statistics Canada, 2015; 89-652.
  7. Doherty A. A Profile of Community Sport Volunteers, Ontario: Parks and Recreation Ontario and Sport Alliance of Ontario. 2005.
  8. Chelladuray P. Madella A. Human resource management in Olympic sports. organizations. First edition, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 2006.
  9. Slaughter L, Home R. Motivations of long-term volunteers: human services vs. events, Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure Science. 2004; 2:1-12.
  10. Japan National Olympic Committee. Volunteering Strategy for the Olympic and Paralympic Games Tokyo 2020. 2016. https://tokyo2020.org.
  11. Krajnakova E, Simkus A, Pilinkiene V, Grabowska M. Analysis of barriers in sports volunteering. Journal of International Studies. 2018; 11(4):254-269.
  12. Paine A, McKay S, Moro D. Volunteering and employability, Journal of Voluntary Sector Review. 2013; 4(3):355-376.
  13. Reid F.Increasing sports participation in Scotland: are voluntary sports clubs the answer.International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. 2012;4(2):221-241.
  14. Darcy S, Maxwell H, Edwards M, Onyx J, Sherker S. More than a sport and volunteer organisation: Investigating social capital development in a sporting organization. Sport Management Review. 2014; 17(4):395-406.