Abstract

Summary
The aim of the present research work was to uncover the phenomenological understanding of gender inequalities in sport. The method was qualitative based on the interpretive/hermeneutic phenomenology. The research population included 15 female athletes with athletic experiences from the childhood to the professional level selected based on a purposeful sampling. The data analysis showed four main themes of female athletes’ lived experiences about gender inequalities including equal opportunities, distributive justice, sovereignty, and social products. Planning to remove the current barriers leads to develop the women sport and talent development up to the professional levels. Finally, the prominent suggestion of the present research work was to design the cultural pattern of women sport.
Introduction
One of the most important inequalities is gender inequality that includes the inequality distribution of wealth, power, opportunity, facilities, and social advantages in different scopes of men and women as well as the behavior reflects of humiliation and exclusion to underrate and stereotyping. The sport institution is a social phenomenon to be present over the society; it influences the institutions of the society as well as its influence on the social conditions. Sport is a key to understand the societies and an introduction to analyze the governing structures in the society. In most of the societies, the sport activities are male-dominated, and subsequently, the facilities are specific to men. Therefore, sport is a gender-based activity. There are different factors involved to define the gender inequalities in Iran. The aim of the present research work was to find a phenomenological understanding of the gender inequalities in sport.
Methodology
The method was qualitative based on phenomenology, and the sampling was purposeful based on a homogenous approach. The main aim of the phenomenology method is to understand the core structure of lived experiences, and it is a kind of philosophical method based on the conscious direct experiences considering phenomena; the direct experiences are described without a theoretical point around the experiences. Holloway and Galvin advice 4 to 40 participants as the sample size. Based on the research purpose “lived experiences about gender inequalities”, the research population included 15 female athletes with athletic experiences to compete in an international level selected based on purposeful sampling. The multiple factors involved were to select the samples: female gender, athlete, long athletic experience, national team membership, age, and different sport fields. The data was collected by semi-structured interviews lasting 40 to 50 minutes per interview. The Glaser’s seven-step method was the concepts out of interviews in terms of 71 codes. In the next step, the codes were classified in specific categories. 15 subthemes were introduced, and finally, four themes were the main themes.
Results and Conclusion
The data analysis showed four main themes of female athletes’ lived experiences about gender inequalities. Unequal gender opportunity: Unequal gender opportunity is one of the key concepts of female athletes’ lived experiences about gender inequalities. The subthemes included unequal opportunities of education, leisure, access, exercise, finance, growth, and employment. The women’s opportunity in sport is not comparable with the men. In fact, the government devotes more resources and facilities to men, and it causes to keep on inequality. In order to create equality, two approaches are suggested: 1) neutral approach to have no gendered discrimination. Therefore, there is no difference between men and women to benefit the resources 2) gender concentration approach to have an equal insight considering national condition, and sometimes focus on women sport more than men to decrease inequality and discrimination. Gender equality infrastructure: In the developing countries, equality is an inaccessible concept in the scope of women sport. Such shortages are more apparent in Iran due to the social and cultural conditions. Justice is to provide all opportunities, planning, facilities, and condition equally without gender discrimination. In the seventh national development plan, the women sport development has been considered. Gender abnormality: Female athletic performance is influenced by outfit, physically and mentally. The only socialization factor in relation with gender inequality is media. Gender discrimination is reflected in media. No media coverage of women sport increase gender inequality. As Bourdieu quoted, the women are faced with media censorship, and the worst kind is visible in TV. Gendered social barriers: Gendered social barriers include unequal social relations and social inequality increase. The cultural problems are stereotypes such as ridicule, social insult, and humiliation words. The female athletes do not have enough social security. The gender harassment is possible. Therefore, a lack of mental security is observable. On the inequality decrease path, the policy-makers and the government have a vital role to create equality and freedom: equal employment opportunity based on competency, women sport support, and equal rewards and payments. These can develop women motivation and their achievements in the international level. The Iranian women attendance in the international completions can promote the Islamic-Iranian culture, and it can be symbolized as Islamic ambassadors to present a nice image of Islam.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Cunningham GB, Melton EN. Signals and cues: LGBT inclusive advertising and consumer attraction. Sport Marketing Quarterly. 2014;23(1):37.
  2. Glick P, Fiske ST. An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American psychologist. 2001;56(2):109.
  3. Shahloo s. The role of culture in balancing gender attitudes to empower women with an emphasis on international instruments. Proceedings of the first conference on women's empowerment in September2000.
  4. AZAM AM, REZAYI A. GENDER INEQUALITY IN EDUCATION IN DORūDFARāMāN PART OF KERMāN-SHāH PROVINCE. 2010.
  5. Shekarbeigi A. Gender inequality and its related factors Among the women citizens of Boukan and Miandoab. Women Studies. 2017;8(21):47-67.
  6. Jackson S. Interchanges: Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality: The complexity (and limits) of heteronormativity. Feminist theory. 2006;7(1):105-21.
  7. Garosi S, Mohamadi K. Delineation of the lived experiences of drug dependent women. Quarterly Journal of Women and Society. 2011;2(5):55-74.
  8. Sfeir L. The status of Muslim women in sport: conflict between cultural tradition and modernization. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 1985;20(4):283-306.
  9. Pulse A. Glass Ceiling For Australian Women In Manufacturing. Aug. 2011;12:2011.
  10. Acosta RV, Carpenter LJ. The status of women in intercollegiate athletics. Women, sport, and culture. 1994:111-8.
  11. Niazi M, Shafaiimoghaddam E. An investigation of factors affecting the rate of fatalism among women. Sociological Cultural Studies. 2014;5(1):123-47.
  12. Bokharaee A, & Yazdkhasti, B. Comparative study: Cultural barriers to realization of gender justice (Case study: Married women in Tehran in 2010 and 2014). Journal of social studies and research in Iran. 2014;3:559-83.
  13. Taj Mazinani AA, & Hamed, M. A study of the transformation of gender culture in textbooks (a comparative study of the first elementary Persian books of 1978, 1983 and 2003). Journal of social sciences. 2014;21:73-104.
  14. Seguino S, Were M. Gender, development and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies. 2014;23(suppl_1):i18-i61.
  15. Birns B. The emergence and socialization of sex differences in the earliest years. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development. 1976;22(3):229-54.
  16. Gill D. Gender issues: A social-educational perspective. Sport psychology interventions. 1995:205-34.
  17. Abdollahi m. Women in the public arena: factors, obstacles and strategies of civil participation of Iranian women. 2000.
  18. Mohammadi Aziz Abadi M, Beheshty SS. Political Sociology of Sport: The impact of sports and professional athletes on political life. 2020.
  19. Coakley JJ. Sport in society: Issues and controversies: CV Mosby Company; 1990.
  20. Panahi Mohammad Hossein SZES. Sources of Power and Ideological Interpretation of the Rules of Women's Sports. Women in Development and Politics. 2012;10(36):5-22.
  21. Spaaij R, Farquharson K, Marjoribanks T. Sport and social inequalities. Sociology Compass. 2015;9(5):400-11.
  22. Andersen ML, & Taylor, H. F. “Understanding a diverse society (4th Ed.)”. 2008.
  23. Clément-Guillotin C, Fontayne P. Situational malleability of gender schema: The case of the competitive sport context. Sex Roles. 2011;64(5):426-39.
  24. Ross SR, Shinew KJ. Perspectives of women college athletes on sport and gender. Sex roles. 2008;58(1):40-57.
  25. Norozi A, Maleki A, Parsamehr M, Ghasemi H. An Investigation into the Relationship between Sexual Norms and Women’s Sport Participation (A Case Study of Women in Ilam Province). 2018.
  26. Poorgachi S, Heidarinejad S, Shetab Booshehri SN, Khatibi A. The Barriers to Promote Female Athletes in Khuzestan Premier League. Sport Management Studies. 2017;9(42):137-62.
  27. Baker C, Seymour E, Zimbalist A. Female athletes are undervalued, in both money and media terms. Forbes. 2019.
  28. Crosby ED. Chased by the double bind: Intersectionality and the disciplining of Lolo Jones. Women's Studies in Communication. 2016;39(2):228-48.
  29. Melton EN, Bryant MJ. Intersectionality: The impact of negotiating multiple identities for women in sport leadership. Women in sport leadership: Research and practice for change. 2017:62-82.
  30. McClung L, Blinde EM. Sensitivity to gender issues: Accounts of women intercollegiate athletes. International Sports Journal. 2002;6(1):117-33.
  31. Azadan M, Koozechian H, Bashiri M, Norouzi Seyyed Hosseini R. Glass Ceiling Status and its Effect on Women’s Reduced Empowerment in Sport Organizations (A Case Study of East Azerbaijan Sport and Youth General Office). Sport Physiology & Management Investigations. 2015;7(1):39-49.
  32. Eriksen IM. Teens’ dreams of becoming professional athletes: The gender gap in youths’ sports ambitions. Sport in Society. 2021:1-15.
  33. Vanzella-Yang A, Finger T. Gender in Coed Team Sports: A Social Psychological Perspective. Sociology of Sport Journal. 2021;38(4):429-35.
  34. Ogilvie M, McCormack M. Gender-collaborative training in elite university sport: Challenging gender essentialism through integrated training in gender-segregated sports. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2021;56(8):1172-88.
  35. Peral-Suárez Á, Cuadrado-Soto E, Perea JM, Navia B, López-Sobaler AM, Ortega RM. Physical activity practice and sports preferences in a group of Spanish schoolchildren depending on sex and parental care: A gender perspective. BMC pediatrics. 2020;20(1):1-10.
  36. Norman M, Donnelly P, Kidd B. Gender inequality in Canadian interuniversity sport: participation opportunities and leadership positions from 2010-11 to 2016-17. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. 2021;13(2):207-23.
  37. Talebpour A, Nazari Azad M, Kashani M. Sociological Analysis of Gender Inequality in Sport (The Perspective of Female National Hero Athlete). Quarterly Journal of Women and Society. 2019;10(40):289-316.
  38. Ehsani Mohammad KH, Kashkar Sara. Study and analysis of deterrents and the participation of women in Tehran in recreational sports activities, . Research in Sports Sciences. 2017;5(17):63 - 87.
  39. Sadeghi Rasoul BI, Mohammadpour Ahmad. Social Inequality in Leisure. Social Welfare Research Quarterly,. 2012;10(39):357- 89.
  40. Ghadimi B. Sport in Tehran City. 2012.
  41. Holloway I, Galvin K. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
  42. Denzin K, Lincoln S. Preface to. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, (5th ed.). Writing: am method of inquiry, (790-9). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2018.
  43. Zarrett N, Cooky C, Veliz P. Coaching through a gender lens: Maximizing girls’ play and potential. Women’s Sports Foundation S. 2019.
  44. Schoch L, Clausen J. Women within international sports federations: contemporary challenges. Histories of Women's Work in Global Sport: Springer; 2019. p. 299-326.
  45. Whiteside E, Hardin M. On being a “good sport” in the workplace: Women, the glass ceiling, and negotiated resignation in sports information. International Journal of Sport Communication. 2012;5(1):51-68.
  46. Alipoor P, Zahedi Mazandarani MJ, Maleki A, Javadi Yegane MR. Representation of Discursive Conflicts of Gender Equity in Development plans of IR Iran. Social Welfare Quarterly. 2017;17(66):107-48.
  47. Holland JR, Oglesby C. Women in sport: The synthesis begins. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1979;445(1):80-90.
  48. Mohammadi GaR, Mohammad Mehdi and Nikouei, Alireza,. Advocacy and Gender; Analysis of Women's Pro-Football Discourse in Iran. Cultural Studies and Communication Quarterly. 2020;16(59):76-105.
  49. Forsyth J, Jones J, Duval L, Bambridge A. Opportunities and barriers that females face for study and employment in sport. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education. 2019;24:80-9.
  50. Gentile A, Boca S, Giammusso I. ‘You play like a Woman!’Effects of gender stereotype threat on Women's performance in physical and sport activities: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2018;39:95-103.
  51. Brake DL. Getting in the Game. Getting in the Game: New York University Press; 2010.
  52. Brake DL. Getting in the Game: New York University Press; 2010.
  53. Rahmati MM. A Sociological Reflection on the Commercialization of Sports. Harakat Quarterly. 2007;32(32):161-86.
  54. farahani A, Hosseini M, Moradi R. Prioritization of deterrents to women's participation in sport activities in Alborz Province, Iran. Journal of School of Public Health & Institute of Public Health Research. 2017;15(1):23-34.
  55. RAMEZANI NR, MALLAEI M, KHALILI SL. IDENTIFICATION AND PRIORITIZATION OF FEMALE CANOEING ATHLETE’S PROBLEMS IN IRAN. 2016.
  56. Cooky C. “We Cannot Stand Idly By”: A Necessary Call for a Public Sociology of Sport1. Sociology of Sport Journal. 2017;34(1):1-11.
  57. Lewis S. Give up on the W-League to keep A-League going? That’s just ‘crazy’,The Guardian. Retrieved from 2020.
  58. Taylor EA, Wells JE. Institutionalized barriers and supports of female athletic directors: A multilevel perspective. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport. 2017;10(2):157-83.
  59. Pape M. Gender segregation and trajectories of organizational change: The underrepresentation of women in sports leadership. Gender & Society. 2020;34(1):81-105.
  60. Khorshidi A, Sadeghipour, N., Noodeh Farahani, E., & Mostame, R. Review of the budget bill for the year 2015 the whole country. Retrieved from Cultural studies office. Department of physical education and youth. 2015.
  61. Chalabaev A, Sarrazin P, Fontayne P, Boiché J, Clément-Guillotin C. The influence of sex stereotypes and gender roles on participation and performance in sport and exercise: Review and future directions. Psychology of sport and exercise. 2013;14(2):136-44.