Abstract

Summary
Each organization consists of various components that are in action and reaction with each other, and the performance of the organization is between them. Hence, the management is complex and difficult in such a system. The framework and modeling of the organization's system help us achieve a better understanding of its integrity by simplifying the system (1). The framework of the organizational issues increases the chances of finding the correct and logical responses to solve them, and understanding its basic mechanisms is easier (2). An overview of the Internal Sport Management Research in the country shows that the performance management and human resource management system in the country's sports organizations have limited analytical frameworks, and requires acceptable models for understanding the organization's performance and its environmental feedback on it. The behavior of the organization applies. Along with the challenges and developments in the country's sports environment, the executive and governmental organizations of the country are also faced with new challenges and requirements, with an additional pressure on their managers. The new challenges and requirements are described with new concepts (3). This work focuses on the issue of low performance of the sports and youth departments and its analysis through new components in order to provide solutions to improve it. Therefore, four specialized categories-which have a high capability in predicting and guiding the performance system of the sports and youth departments in today's environmental conditions-are examined and included; system transparency is the use of experience, positive synergy, and performance.
Introduction
A review of research works has shown that the four variables of organizational transparency, organizational ambiguity, human capital enhancement, and documentation of experiences in the country's sports organizations have not been described and correlated so far. However, the discussed variables play a key role in the performance of sports organizations in the today's environment, and based on the fact that in the previous research works, none of these variables have been studied in domestic sports management studies. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the country's sports management researchers, and provide sufficient information to the managers. The aim of this research work was to investigate the effect of organizational transparency on the organizational ambidexterity with the mediating role of human capital synergy and of documentation experiences in the Tehran sports and youth administrations.
The necessity of research is explained in several aspects: first, these concepts have not been studied in the sports organizations in the country, while their desirability in these organizations is very necessary. Along with these vacuums mentioned in the domestic research works, despite the knowledge produced in the foreign investigations, this information alone is not effective for the analysis and management of the structural-functional aspects in the sports organizations of the country, and is a necessary indigenous and specialized research in completing and applying them. In this regard, the sports and youth agencies in the Tehran province are one of the largest sports organizations in the country, based on the importance of urban sports services, requiring an efficient and consistent management system for the modern conditions.
Methodology and Approach
The present work was descriptive-correlational in terms of the applied purpose in terms of the field data collection method. The statistical population consisted of all the employees of the sports and youth departments in the Tehran province. For sampling, all departments were considered as a comprehensive organizational system. A sufficient number of statistical samples were selected to test the model in the Smart Payals software. The basis for determining the sample based on 10 to 20 times the number of questions related to the main variables has the highest number of questions in the model (Davari and Rezazadeh, 2016). Therefore, the basis for the organizational transparency variable (12 questions) was 15 times, and the number of samples was estimated to be 180 (12 * 15 = 180). The statistical sampling was done by the random sampling method among the youth sports departments of the Tehran province (General Administration of Provinces and Cities). Out of 200 distributed questionnaires (in person, social media, and e-mail), 179 questionnaires were received, of which 172 questionnaires were fully answered and analyzed. The personal characteristics of the respondents included: mean age, 34.36; related work experience, 12.84; gender ratio, 42% female and 58% male; education ratio, 0.35 bachelor, 0.41 master, and 0.14 doctorate. The research tool was a questionnaire containing 40 questions for four variables (and 9 dimensions) on a 5-point Likert scale. For the research validation, using the content validity method (11 experts), and reliability (Cronbach's alpha), the construct validity (model fitting) was evaluated and verified.
Results and Conclusion
In the factor analysis of the dimensions of variables, the three components including the transparency of activities (0.89), transparency of laws (0.82), and transparency of resources (0.80) had a significant role in explaining the organizational transparency, respectively. The employees’ experiences (0.90) and managers' experiences (0.86) also explain the documentation of experiences in a significant way, respectively. The effectiveness of performance (0.93) and the culture of teamwork (0.89) also had a significant role in explaining the synergistic variable of the employees, respectively. The components of exploitation (0.94) and exploration (0.93) had a more significant role in explaining the organizational duality, respectively. The direct relationship path analysis showed that organizational transparency with coefficients of 0.71, 0.46, and 0.72, respectively, had a significant effect on the documenting experiences, employee synergy, and organizational ambiguity. Documentation of experiences with coefficients of 0.43 and 0.46, respectively, had a significant effect on the staff synergy and ambiguity. The employee synergy with a coefficient of 0.35 had a direct and significant effect on the organizational ambiguity. The sub-test for indirect relationships showed that the indirect effect of organizational transparency on the organizational ambiguity was significant through both mediation of experience documentation (0.43) and employee synergy (0.36). Based on the results obtained, the mediating effect of documenting experiences was greater than that of staff synergy. The direct effect of organizational transparency on the organizational ambidexterity was more than the indirect effect. Therefore, e-readiness, although having a significant effect on the organizational ambiguity, is enhanced by the intervention of two mediating variables. Thus the application of organizational transparency of the youth and sports departments can lead to a higher performance when integrated with the HRM system.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Bayati B, Solymani M, Ahmadi S. The effect of organizational inertia on organizational hypocrisy with the mediator of Social Undermining and Working low (case study in the Tehran Municipality Sports Organization). Scientific Journal Of Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies. 2019;6(2):85-99.
  2. Saati-Zarei AA. Designing a model of the empowerment effect of employees with the mediating role of talent management and organizational intelligence in the general departments of sports and youth of the country: PhD dissertation of Hamadan Islamic Azad University; 2019. (Persian).
  3. Darvishi H, Azimi-Zachekani F. The effect on reducing corruption organization Transparency mediated by organizational trust studied Khordad hospital staff Varamin. Journal of Public Administration. 2016;8(1):153-66. (Persian).
  4. Miandari K, Deyhimpour M, Najjari R, Abedijafari H. Designing a Model for Increasing Organizational Transparency with a Data Driven Approach in Governmental Organizations. Journal of Research on Management of Teaching in Marine Sciences. 2018;5(1):95-110.
  5. Azar A, Ismailpour R, Taheri SM. Investigating the Effect of Organizational Bicycling on the Performance of Service Organizations with the Role of Environmental Dynamics Modification. National Conference on World Scientific Research in Management, Accounting, Law and Social Sciences; Shiraz. 2017. (Persian).
  6. Razavi SM, Shahriari SA, Ahmadpour-Dariani M. The Effect of Organizational Ambidexterity on Strategic Entrepreneurship. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development. 2016;8(4):767-86. (Persian).
  7. Paliokaitė A, Pačėsa N. The relationship between organisational foresight and organisational ambidexterity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2015;101:165-81.
  8. Rahmani-Sarsht H, Mazloumi N, Sefidchian S. Documentation of Experiences: Dimensions of Concept, Stimuli and Consequences. Tehran: First Edition. Marandiz Publications; 2017. (Persian).
  9. Navidi F, Riyahiniya N. The role of documentation in organizational knowledge management: A case study at satellite research institute. Journal of Library and Information Science Studies. 2017;24(19):3-20. (Persian).
  10. Zamani A. Qualitative Analysis of Principles of Documenting the Organizational Experiences of University Directors. Journal of Research in Educational Science. 2017;10(35):201-28. (Persian).
  11. Farajvand E. from synergy to synnovation. Quarterly Journal of Public Organzations Management. 2018;6(1):51-62. (Persian).
  12. Rafighi M. Synergy Thermodynamic Interactive Patterns in Human Capital Education Quality. First International Conference on Management, Economics, Accounting and Educational Sciences; Sari. 2015. (Persian).
  13. Ji W, Zhang S, Yukawa S, Onomura S, Sasaki T, Miyazawa Ki, et al. Regulating higher-order organization through the synergy of two self-sorted assemblies. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2018;57(14):3636-40.
  14. Asgari-Anaraki A, Hashemi-Fesharaki F. Mechanisms for increasing synergy (synergy) in holding organizations. International Conference on Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering; Tehran. 2015. (Persian).
  15. naghavi Ms, Farahani F. Ccultivating Strategic fit and Organizational Transparency PromotionThrough Innovation Leadership Style. Management Studies in Development and Evolution. 2014;22(72):75-97. (Persian).
  16. Mombeini Y, Ebrahimpoor M, Moradi M. The study of ambiguities and typology of organizational ambidexterity in technology- based organizations. Journal of industrial technology development. 2014;12(23):59-72. (Persian).
  17. Talebi A, Amini S, Tolouparsa F. Investigation on the relationship of feeling of anomie and possibility of communicative action in Mashhad. Journal of Social Problems of Iran. 2015;6(1):51-70.
  18. Mazloumi N, Sefidchian S. Investigating the role of change capacity in shaping the documentation of experiences with a qualitative approach. Quarterly Journal of Organizational Behavior Studies. 2015;4(2):1-26. (Persian).
  19. Liaqat J. The relationship between information technology and organizational structure and the performance of the staff of the General Directorate of Sports and Youth of Fars: Master Thesis. Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan Branch; 2016. (Persian).
  20. Mazloumi N, Sedghiani JS, Sefidchian S. A model for documenting experiences and the factors that create them. Quarterly Journal of Organizational Behavior Studies. 2017;6(4):103-7. (Persian).
  21. Ramezani M. The Impact of Organizational Transparency on Administrative Corruption with the Mediation of Cultural Attitudes Case Study: Employees of the General Directorate of Sports and Youth of Mazandaran Province: Master's thesis, University of the North, Faculty of Sports Sciences; 2017. (Persian).
  22. Asayesh L. Designing a model of human resource management and organizational culture on the effectiveness of the organization with the mediation of knowledge management in the General Directorate of Sports and Youth of East Azerbaijan Province: PhD thesis. University of Guilan, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences; 2018. (Persian).
  23. Hakimi-Ghadimi M. The effect of management information systems on organizational performance (Case study: General Directorate of Sports and Youth of East Azerbaijan Province). East Azerbaijan: Master Thesis. Azerbaijan Niloufari Wheel Higher Education Institute; 1397. (Persian).
  24. Gibson C, Birkinshaw J. Contextual determinants of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal. 2004;47(2):209-26.
  25. Johnson P, Duberley J. Anomie and culture management: reappraising Durkheim. Organization. 2011;18(4):563-84.
  26. Halachmi A, Greiling D. Transparency, e-government, and accountability: Some issues and considerations. Public Performance & Management Review. 2013;36(4):562-84.
  27. Cordella A, Tempini N. E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly. 2015;32(3):279-86.
  28. Aniscenko Z, Robalino-López A, Rodrígue TE, Pérez BE, editors. Regional Cooperation in Dealing with Environmental Protection. E-government and Sustainable Development in Andean Countries. ENVIRONMENT TECHNOLOGIES RESOURCES Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference; 2017.
  29. Menchetelli V. Digital Cultural Heritage| International Experiences Documentation, Survey and Representation for Knowledge, Design and Conservation. diségno. 2018(3):248-50.
  30. Joshi PR, Islam S. E-government maturity model for sustainable e-government services from the perspective of developing countries. Sustainability. 2018;10(6):1882.
  31. Santos R, Pereira I, Azevedo I. Dynamic Generation of Documentation, Code, and Tests for a Digital Marketing Platform's API. Code Generation, Analysis Tools, and Testing for Quality: IGI Global; 2019. p. 1-35.
  32. Pamment J. Accountability as strategic transparency: Making sense of organizational responses to the International Aid Transparency Initiative. Development Policy Review. 2019;37(5):657-71.
  33. Shehab RAH. Organizational Ambidexterity Practices to Achieve Strategic Agility in Sports Clubs. International Journal of Sports Science and Arts. 2019;3(02):36-58.
  34. Vo Thanh T, Seraphin H, Okumus F, Koseoglu MA. Organizational ambidexterity in tourism research: A systematic review. Tourism Analysis. 2020;25(1):137-52.
  35. Wolfe RA, Weick KE, Usher JM, Terborg JR, Poppo L, Murrell AJ, et al. Sport and organizational studies: Exploring synergy. Journal of Management Inquiry. 2005;14(2):182-210.
  36. Ziakas V, Costa CA. The use of an event portfolio in regional community and tourism development: Creating synergy between sport and cultural events. Journal of Sport & Tourism. 2011;16(2):149-75.
  37. Fitzgerald MP, Sagaria MAD, Nelson B. Career patterns of athletic directors: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Sport Management. 2014;8(1):14-26.
  38. Jackson B, Gucciardi DF, Dimmock JA. Toward a multidimensional model of athletes’ commitment to coach-athlete relationships and interdependent sport teams: A substantive-methodological synergy. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2014;36(1):52-68.
  39. HUANG Y-l, SHAO Y-j. Development of Network Sports Organization: Challenge of Virtualization and Reality. Journal of Beijing Sport University. 2015:11.
  40. Araújo D, Davids K. Team synergies in sport: theory and measures. Frontiers in psychology. 2016;7:1449.
  41. Král P, Cuskelly G. A model of transparency: Determinants and implications of transparency for national sport organizations. European Sport Management Quarterly. 2018;18(2):237-62.
  42. Davari A, Rezazadeh A. Structural Equation Modeling with PLS Software. First Edition ed. Tehran: University Jihad; 2016.
  43. Rashidnia M. Investigating the Relationship between Psychological Empowerment and Proportionality - Person in the General Department of Sports and Youth of Guilan Province: Gilan University Master's Thesis; 2017. (Persian).
  44. Ziaei S, Tavakoli S. Documenting Experiences: An Analysis of Behavioral–Cultural Factors and the Mechanisms of Recording Managers' Experiences (Case Study of Documentation Center of Astan Quds Razavi). National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization. 2016;26(4):139-54.