Abstract

Summary
The purpose of the present research work was to study the effect of the managers’ coaching skill on the physical education teachers’ feedback-seeking behavior with the mediating role of emotional trust. This research work was a survey, and 243 physical education teachers in the Golestan province answered the three questionnaires of coaching skills, emotional trust, and feedback seeking behavior. The results obtained indicated that the managers’ coaching skill had a positive and significant effect on the emotional trust and feedback-seeking behavior. The results obtained showed that the effect of emotional trust on the feedback-seeking behavior was positive and significant. The effect of the managers’ coaching skill on the feedback-seeking behavior with the mediator role of emotional trust was not confirmed.
Introduction
Enhancing the feedback seeking behavior in the employees allows them to use multiple sources of information to seek additional information about their performance (1). One of the factors that can affect the employee feedback seeking behavior is the coaching skills of managers (2). Anssel et al. (2015) have stated that the development of the feedback seeking behavior through coaching skills strengthens the working relationships, and develops the employees' social interactions. Having open communication between the employees allows them to use others as a reliable source of feedback, and use their suggestions to perform tasks (3). On the other hand, the managers' coaching skills are among the things that can lead to positive actions by the managers towards the employees. In fact, the coaching skills of the managers is a kind of benevolent leadership that can strengthen the positive feelings of the employees through the level of concern and care of managers towards their subordinates. Sensitivity to the employee performance and well-being, more attention to employee growth and development, and creating a supportive atmosphere in the organization by managers while increasing the atmosphere of trust in the organization will strengthen the positive job behaviors such as the feedback seeking behavior (4).
Methodology and Approach
This research work was of survey type. The population of the present study consisted of all physical the education teachers of the Golestan Province (N=655 teachers), which according to the Cochran formula, 243 persons were selected as the sample size by the cluster sampling method and answered the questionnaires of coaching skills (Park et al., 2008), emotional trust (McAllister, 1995), and feedback seeking behavior (Moss et al., 2003). The content validity of the research questionnaires was confirmed by 5 PhDs in sports management, and their reliability in a pilot study was estimated to be 0.79, 0.87, and 0.84, respectively, which indicated the stability of the measurement tool. Data analysis was performed in the two descriptive and inferential ways. For this purpose, the SPSS software (version 22) and the Smart software (version 3) were used.
Result and Conclusion
The results of the work indicated that the managers’ coaching skill had a positive and significant effect on the feedback-seeking behavior (t = 4.048, β = 0.317). Another finding of the research work showed that the managers’ coaching skill had a significant effect on the emotional trust of the physical education teachers (t = 35.568, β = 0.830). Another part of the research work results showed that the effect of emotional trust on the feedback-seeking behavior was positive and significant (t = 8.889, β = 0.589). Finally, the results obtained showed that the effect of managers’ coaching skill on the feedback-seeking behavior of physical education teachers with the mediator role of emotional trust was not significant (t = 1.063, β = 0.018). Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that the coaching skills of managers can have positive consequences such as developing emotional trust among the physical education teachers and increasing their feedback seeking behavior. Creating open communication channels in schools by the principals in order to share the ideas and opinions between the teachers and principals, more attention by the managers to the job expectations of physical education teachers, develop collaborative decision-making between the principals and physical education teachers, and provide appropriate feedback on the performance of these teachers based on the functional facts, and mutual respect are recommended.

Keywords

  1. Lee JY, Lee Y. Job crafting and performance: literature review and implications for human resource development. Human Resource Development Review. 2018; 17(3): 277-313.
  2. Mewald C, Mürwald‐Scheifinger E. Lesson study in teacher development: A paradigm shift from a culture of receiving to a culture of acting and reflecting. European Journal of Education. 2019; 54(2): 218-232.
  3. Moon K, Lee K, Lee K, Oah S. The effects of social comparison and objective feedback on work performance across different performance levels. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management. 2017; 37: 63-74.
  4. Palmer MG, Johnson CM, Johnson DA. Objective performance feedback: Is numerical accuracy necessary? Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2015; 35: 206-239.
  5. Weatherly NL, Malott RW. An analysis of organizational behavior management research in terms of the three-contingency model of performance management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management. 2008; 28: 260-285.
  6. Johnson DA, Rocheleau JM, Tilka RE. Considerations in feedback delivery: The role of accuracy and type of evaluation. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management. 2015; 35: 240-258.
  7. Vorsselman D. How do management consultants learn in the workplace: the influence of antecedents of feedback-seeking behavior and feedback? Master’s Thesis. 2017; Radboud University.
  8. Dahling JJ, O’Malley AL. Supportive feedback environments can mend broken performance management systems. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice. 2011; 4: 201-203.
  9. Levy PE, Albright MD, Cawley BD, Williams JR. Situational and individual determinants of feedback seeking: A closer look at the process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1995; 62: 23-37.
  10. Ashford SJ, Cummings LL. Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 1983; 32: 370-398.
  11. Beenen G, Pichler S, Levy PE. Self‐Determined feedback seeking: The role of perceived supervisor autonomy support. Human Resource Management. 2017; 56(4): 555-569.
  12. Li X, Qian J. Stimulating employees' feedback-seeking behavior: The role of participative decision making. Social Behavior and Personality: An international Journal. 2016; 44: 1-8.
  13. Steelman LA, Wolfeld L. The manager as coach: The role of feedback orientation. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2016; 33(1): 41-53.
  14. Hsieh HH, Huang JT. Exploring factors influencing employees' impression management feedback-seeking behavior: The role of managerial coaching skills and affective trust. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2018; 29(2): 163-180.
  15. Ellinger AE, Ellinger AD, Bachrach DG, Wang Y, Baş ABE. Organizational investments in social capital, managerial coaching, and employee work related performance. Management Learning. 2011; 42: 67-85.
  16. Batson, VD, Yoder LH. Managerial coaching: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2012; 6: 1658-1669.
  17. Liu X, Batt R. How supervisors influence performance: A multilevel study of coaching and group management in technology-mediated services. Personnel Psychology. 2010; 63: 265-298.
  18. Agarwal R, Angst CM, Magni The performance impacts of coaching: A multilevel analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2009; 20: 2110-2134.
  19. Gilley A, Gilley J, Kouider E. Characteristics of managerial coaching. Performance Improvement Quarterly. 2010; 23(1): 53-70.
  20. Kim S, Kuo MH. Examining the relationships among coaching, trustworthiness, and role behaviors: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2015; 51: 152-176.
  21. Anseel F, Beatty AS, Shen W, Lievens F, Sackett PR. How are we doing after 30 years? A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior. Journal of Management. 2015; 41: 318-348.
  22. Wang B, Qian J, Ou R, Huang C, Xu B, Xia Y. Transformational leadership and employees’ feedback seeking: the mediating role of trust in leader. Social Behavior and Personality. 2016; 44(7): 1201-1208.
  23. McAllister DJ. Affect and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal. 1995; 38: 24-59.
  24. Lam LW, Peng KZ, Wong CS, Lau DC. Is more feedback seeking always better? Leader-member exchange moderates the relationship between feedback-seeking behavior and performance. Journal of Management. 2015; 43(7): 2195-2217.
  25. Burke CS, Sims DE, Lazzara EH, Salas E. Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly. 2007; 18: 606–632.
  26. Choi BK, Moon HK, Nae EY. Cognition and affect-based trust and feedback-seeking behavior: The roles of value, cost, and goal orientations. The Journal of Psychology. 2014; 148(5): 603-620.
  27. Van der Rijt J, Den Bossche PV, Van de Wiel MWJ, Segers MSR, Gijselaers WH. The role of individual and organizational characteristics in feedback seeking behavior in the initial career stage. Human Resource Development International. 2012; 15(3): 283-301.
  28. Huang JT. Be proactive as empowered? The role of trust in one’s supervisor in psychological empowerment, feedback seeking, and job performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2012; 42(1): 103-127.
  29. Auh S, Menguc B, Imer P, Uslu A. Frontline employee feedback-seeking behavior: How is it formed and when does it matter? Journal of Service Research. 2019; 22(1): 44-59.
  30. Sung S, Rhee Y, Lee J, Choi J, Yoon H. Multilevel social predictors of employee feedback-seeking behavior: A cost–benefit perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. 2019; 47(2): 1-11.
  31. Fu RH, Cho YH, Quattri F, Monrouxe I did not check if the teacher gave feedback: A qualitative analysis of Taiwanese postgraduate year 1 trainees’ talk around e-portfolio feedback-seeking behaviors, BMJ Open. 2019; 9(1): 1-9.
  32. Bai N. Studying relationship between workplace discrimination and quality of work life of physical education teachers in Golestan p Journal of Human Resource Management in Sport. 2019; 6(2), 333-344.
  33. Beyrami M, Hasanabadi HR, Kavossian The approaches and obstacles to providing feedback to students in the descriptive assessment program. Educational measurement and Evaluation Studies. 2017; 6(16): 7-42.
  34. Park S, Yang B, McLean GN. An examination of relationships between managerial coaching and employee development. Paper presented at the Academy of Human Resource Development International Research Conference in the Americas, Panama City, 2008; 20-24.
  35. Moss SE, Valenzi ER, Taggart W. Are you hiding from your boss? The development of a taxonomy and instrument to assess the feedback management behaviors of good and bad performers. Journal of Management. 2003; 29: 487–510.
  36. Seyed Abbaszadeh MM, Amani Saribegloo Javad, Khezri Azar Heiman, Pashoui Q. Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling by PLS Method and Its Application in Behavioral Sciences. 2013; First Edition, Urmia, Urmia University Press.