Abstract

Summary
The aim was to identify and model the effective factors on the development of employment of sports science graduates, and provide a conceptual framework. The research method was descriptive-correlation. According to the findings, the model included three environmental and ecosystem levels, structural and systemic levels, and then functional and development levels. The fit indices of the model were at a favorable level. Thus the change in the relatively traditional and inefficient system of education in the Azad universities towards new, skill-oriented, and employable approaches requires changes in the generality of the educational system and more independence in the decision-making of educational programs in the Azad universities.
Introduction
The educational systems have employability, skill-oriented, and entrepreneurial orientation (1). The employability of students and graduates depends on the other factors in addition to the quality of education, which have different results based on the regional and ecosystem conditions (2). The sports education and employment system consist of various components and various relationships between them; therefore, management in such a system will be very complex. An Azad University has few acceptable methods to properly measure its adaptation to environmental changes. In this research work, an effort is made to study the factors influencing the employment development of the sports science graduates of the Azad Universities and analyze them in a coordinated way with an ecosystem perspective.
Methodology and Approach
The research method was descriptive-correlation. The statistical population included the sports science professors of the Azad Universities, the employed sports science graduates, the managers and professors of the Azad Universities, and the experts in the field of employment in sports. The number of samples was estimated and selected based on the sufficient number for modeling in the PLS software, 10 to 20 times the number of questions related to the variable with the most questions in the model (3). Therefore, 168 people were estimated to be 12 times the number of variable questions with the highest number of questions (14 questions in employment development strategies). The research tool was a questionnaire extracted from the qualitative phase of the research work. For this purpose, the systematic library study and exploratory interview were used. In the qualitative part, sampling was done with a purposeful (judgmental) method until a theoretical saturation was reached (16 people). These people included the university professors, executive managers, entrepreneurs, and post-graduate graduates (business owners in sports) in the field of physical education. The questionnaire was set on a five-point Likert scale (from very low = 1 to very high = 5). The face and content validity of the questionnaire was given to six professors and six administrators and confirmed. The reliability or internal consistency of the questionnaire was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha (ɑ = 0.86). In inferential statistics, it was designed using the partial least squares method in three parts: the measurement model, the structural model, and the general model. The structural model section also contains all the structures mentioned in the main model of the research work, and the degree of correlation between the structures and the relationships between them is the focus and attention in this part. In the general model section, which includes both measurement and structural model sections, the fit check in a model is completed by verifying its fit.
Result and Conclusion
In the fitting of the model, the first investigated index was included, which was favorable. For the differential validity of the measurement model, the Fornell and Locker's criterion was used, which was favorable. It is a reliability analysis index that is equal to and above 7 0, and is listed as appropriate. The value of R2 was calculated to fit the endogenous (dependent) structures of the model, and had three levels: weak, medium and strong. The Q2 criterion specifies the predictive power of the model, and in the case of an endogenous construct, it specifies the weak, medium, and strong predictive power. The results of the quantitative part showed that in the structural equation model of the research work, all fit indices were favorable. 
Based on the path analysis of the relationships between the main variables, it was determined that the approaches of the educational system had a positive and significant effect on the sports science capabilities of the Azad Universities, the management of graduate employment challenges, and the capacities of the employment system in sports. The market of employment trends had a positive and significant effect on the management of graduate employment challenges and the capacities of the employment system in sports. The sports science capabilities of the Azad Universities had a positive and significant effect on the capacities of the employment system in sports and the strategies for developing the employment of the graduates. The capacities of the employment system in sports had a positive and significant effect on the management of graduate employment challenges and graduate employment development strategies. Management of graduate employment challenges had a positive and significant effect on the graduate employment development strategies. The graduate employment development strategies had a positive and significant effect on the possible and preferred outcomes. It is suggested that the components, themes, and framework presented in this research work should be used for the conceptual enrichment of documents and programs, comprehensiveness in decisions and actions, as well as process perspective in the evaluation and management of performance related to education and employment of graduates. From a systemic viewpoint, the approach of relationships between the variables is from the ecosystem-environmental factors (precedence and contextual role) to structural-systemic factors (process role), and finally, the functional-consequence factors (consequence role). From the multi-level viewpoint, the macro-micro factors and the individual-organizational-institutional factors have been identified. A previous research work also confirms the generality of the research conceptual model. The generality of the model is aligned and compatible with the model-oriented research in the fields of the country's sports entrepreneurship ecosystem. However, the difference between this research work and other previous research works is related to the application of the ecosystem approach in identifying and framing the influencing variables. In fact, the structures of the conceptual model of this research work are a combination of the main conceptual structures (sports sciences, free university, employment, labor market, etc.) with an internal and external perspective.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Ashuri T. Evaluation of Job Opportunities and Entrepreneurship in the Field of Sports Services: University of Mazandaran; 2018.
  2. Ministry of Cooperation LaSW. https://ssicenter.mcls.gov.ir/ 2018 [
  3. Negahdari F, Ghahraman Tabrizi K, Sharifian I, Biabani H. Identification and Ranking of the Dimensions of the Sports Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Iran. Sport Management Studies. 2019;11(59): 79-104.
  4. Farahani A, Safarnejad M. Entrepreneurship and employment in sports, Publisher: Science and Sports: Tehran 2018.
  5. Ifenthaler D, Adcock AB, Erlandson BE, Gosper M, Greiff S, Pirnay-Dummer P. Challenges for education in a connected world: Digital learning, data rich environments, and computer-based assessment—Introduction to the inaugural special issue of technology, knowledge and learning. Technology, knowledge and learning. 2014;19(1):121-6.
  6. Jones P, Jones A, Williams-Burnett N, Ratten V. Let’s get physical: Stories of entrepreneurial activity from sports coaches/instructors. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. 2017;18(4):219-30.
  7. Sharifi A. Study of employment of sports science students in universities of Guilan province: University of Guilan; 2020.
  8. Mondalizade z, ehsani m, honari h. Developing Sustainable Entrepreneurship Model in Sport Based on the Grounded Theory. Journal of Sport Management. 2016;8(5):709-25.
  9. Razavi MH. Designing the employment system of physical education students Research project of the Institute of Physical Education and Sports Sciences; 2014.
  10. Boroumand MR. Strategic Analysis of Employment Status of Physical Education and Sports Graduates.University of Guilan 2011.
  11. Farahmandmehr A. Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Design in Sports.: Islamic Azad University of South Tehran; 2017.
  12. Boroumand MR, Purkiani M, Taghian Dinani B. Factors Affecting the Establishment and Development of Sports Businesses in Graduates of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. Third National Congress of Sports Science and Health Achievements: University of Guilan; 2019.
  13. Sleap M. University experiences and the employment environment. Unpublished Research Report, Higher Education Academy Network for Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Available from: http://www hlst heacademy ac uk/projects/sleap_summary pdf. 2005.
  14. Kellett P, Russell R. A comparison between mainstream and action sport industries in Australia: A case study of the skateboarding cluster. Sport Management Review. 2009;12(2):66-78.
  15. Zheng J, Mason DS. Brand platform in the professional sport industry: Sustaining growth through innovation: Springer; 2018.
  16. Ratten V. Sport entrepreneurial ecosystems and knowledge spillovers. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 2021;19(1):43-52.
  17. Nam B, Shin Y, Jung K, Kim J, Nam S. Promoting knowledge economy, human capital, and dual careers of athletes: a critical approach to the Global Sports Talent Development Project in South Korea. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. 2019;11(4):607-24.
  18. Özdinç Ö. Social risk-taking in school-to-work transition: A panel study of sport graduates. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education. 2020;27:100261.
  19. Sato S, Kang T-A, Daigo E, Matsuoka H, Harada M. Graduate employability and higher education’s contributions to human resource development in sport business before and after COVID-19. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education. 2021;28:100306.
  20. Vaghefi Nazari RS, Farahani A, Asad MR, Khodadadi MR. Job Expectations of Physical Education Students of Their Job and Job Prospect in Tehran Azad Universities. Journal of Sports Management2015;7(2): 175-89.
  21. Goodarzi M, Jalali Farahani, M., Rajabi, H., & Hamidi, M. Analysis of Effective Behavioral Factors in Promoting Entrepreneurship of Sports Management Students Scientific. Research Quarterly of Organizational Behavior Management Studies in Sport. 2016;3(3):45-53.
  22. Bani Asadi G. (Evaluation of Entrepreneurship Indices in Physical Education Faculties of the Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. : University of Shahid Bahonar University; 2016.
  23. Razavi MH. Designing the employment system of physical education students Research project of the Institute of Physical Education and Sports Sciences; 2017.
  24. Adly K. The Impact of Social Entrepreneurship on Employment Employment of Physical Education Graduates of Payame Noor University: Payame Noor University, Tehran Province 2018.
  25. Ratten V. Entrepreneurship, innovation and smart cities: Routledge; 2017.
  26. Terra B, Oliveira ARd, Almeida M, Batista LA, Santos JANd, Nogueira JA, et al. Sport innovation: An opportunity for technology-based companies stimulated by the Brazil Olympics. Sport entrepreneurship and public policy: Springer; 2020. p. 41-68.
  27. Lu H-F. Enhancing university student employability through practical experiential learning in the sport industry: An industry-academia cooperation case from Taiwan. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education. 2021;28:100301.
  28. Mohsenifar A. A Study of Success Factors in Career Selection of Physical Education and Sports Science Students of Mazandaran University,The First National Conference on New Research Findings in Sports Science, Social Activity, Entrepreneurship and Championship: Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz; 2016.
  29. Moradi S. Employment of Postgraduate Students in the field of physical education based on the Rothwell model: University of Razi; 2018.
  30. Yavari F, Heydarinejad S, Habibi A. Study of entrepreneurship characteristics among physical education students and effect of university's courses on its development. International Journal of Sport Studies. 2013;3(1):67-73.
  31. Nová J. Developing the entrepreneurial competencies of sport management students. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences. 2015;174:3916-24.
  32. Ratten V, Jones P. Future research directions for sport education: Toward an entrepreneurial learning approach. Education+ Training. 2018.
  33. Zakrevskaya N, Androsova G, Mikhailova EY, Shchennikov A. Labor market demand for graduates of sports universities: status and prospects. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture. 2020(9):61-3.
  34. Brown JL, Hammer SJ, Perera HN, McIlveen P. Relations between graduates’ learning experiences and employment outcomes: A cautionary note for institutional performance indicators. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance. 2022;22(1):137-56.
  35. Davari A, Rezazadeh A. Structural equation modeling with PLS software. Publisher Jahad Academic Publications Organization; 2015.
  36. Farahani A, Gholampour E, AdelKhani A. The Role of Management and Policy-Making in Physical Education Faculties and Departments in Guiding Students' Career Expectations (Determining the Monk and Politics). Journal of Applied Research of Sport Management. 2013;2(5):121-38.