Abstract

Summary
The purpose of this research work was to design a paradigm model of operationalizing entrepreneurship among sports sciences students. The research method was carried out using the framework of the qualitative approach and using the foundation's data analysis method with the Strauss and Corbin method. The findings show that in the paradigm model, 28 concepts were identified in factors such as causal, contextual, intervening, strategy, and consequence. It can be said that the university has the necessary platforms such as having an entrepreneurship consultant from among the executive faculty members, holding entrepreneurship festivals, holding startup courses, and financial support for students' entrepreneurial ideas, and it can be effective in facilitating the operationalization of their entrepreneurial thoughts.
Introduction
Today, the importance of human resources in various processes is recognized as an important factor. Human resources are as a capital that is recognized as a valuable driving force in all different organizations. Human capital has skill, ability, experience, motivation, and knowledge acquisition (1). Basically, entrepreneurship is the basis of economic development, which is expressed as a source of employment and income (2). Entrepreneurship is considered as the third mission of universities because it aims to reflect its contributions to the society (3). The university can create a rich environment that can provide information and reliable role models, emotional support, and psychological and material resources more important for honoring an entrepreneurial behavior. A university's entrepreneurial educational support such as entrepreneurship courses, tutorials, and lectures can help the students acquire information and gather additional entrepreneurial knowledge, skills, and capacities. It also allows the students to connect with influential people including entrepreneurial investors, suppliers, distributors, and potential customers (4). Despite the alarming unemployment situation of university graduates in the country, sports has a suitable and diverse place to create employment and create new opportunities for economic activities, which by knowing the work fields in which new opportunities can be introduced to the youth and the society. Therefore, the purpose of this research work was to design a paradigm model of operationalizing entrepreneurship among the sports sciences students.
Methodology and Approach
The research method is exploratory in terms of its nature, and inductive in terms of data collection method, and it is of the qualitative research type, which is collected by the foundation data method based on the guidelines suggested by Strauss and Corbin. The participants of this research work included academic and entrepreneurial experts, who could provide valuable information to the researcher. In this regard, the samples of the qualitative part of this research work included 20 people from science and technology park officials, scientific professors of the physical education faculty, sports entrepreneur students, CEO of the industrial estates company, and an entrepreneurship instructor and consultant. At the end, a paradigm model was designed.
Results and Conclusion
The sports science students use opportunities, take risks, solve problems, and create careers for themselves. They need to take risks in creating and commercializing innovative technologies in a way that a big businesses cannot. Sometimes these technologies open entirely new markets, and revolutionize industries. Therefore, universities target the field of entrepreneurship and pay more attention to the sports and economic industry; sports science students can have smooth ways to create a job. By applying the mentioned solutions, the university managers and professors can help the progress of sports science students in the direction of developing entrepreneurship and making it operational.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Badriazarin Y, Talebiannia H, Salmani A. Strategies in the Human Resources Development of Gymnastic Sport. Sport Management Studies. 2013;5(19):81-92.
  2. Razavi SMJ, Talebpour,.M., Azimzadeh, S.M., Mohammadkazemi, R. Identifying and Prioritizing Factors Involved in Human Capital Development in Iran's Sports Production Firms using Multi-Criteria Analysis and Copland's Approach. Journal of Human Resource Management in Sport. 2020;8(1):1-17.
  3. Jalayee SA, Bakhshandeh H, Esmaili M, Rasooli M. The Role of Human Resources in the Economic Growth of Irans Sports Industry. Sport Management Studies. 2018;10(48):67-88.
  4. Hashemi Siavoshani M, Javadipour, M., Hossein Ghorbani, M. Codification of Strategic Human Resource Management Plan in Ministry of Sports and Youth. Journal of Human Resource Management in Sport. 2021;8(2):237-53.
  5. Akinbola OA, Ogunnaike OO, Amaihian AB. The influence of contextual factors on entrepreneurial intention of university students in Nigeria. Creating Global Competitive Economies. 2020;1:1-3.
  6. Ali M, Abou E. Determinants of entrepreneurial intention among Sudanese university students. Management Science Letters. 2020;10(12):2849-60.
  7. Alizadeh ZM, Ehsani M, Kozechian H, Honari H. The environmental factor affecting on sport entrepreneurship. Sport Management Studies. 2015;7(29):99-116.
  8. Al-Jubari I, Hassan A, Liñán F. Entrepreneurial intention among University students in Malaysia: integrating self-determination theory and the theory of planned behavior. International entrepreneurship and management journal. 2019;15(4):1323-42.
  9. Anwar I, Thoudam P, Saleem I. Role of entrepreneurial education in shaping entrepreneurial intention among university students: Testing the hypotheses using mediation and moderation approach. Journal of Education for Business. 2022;97(1):8-20.
  10. Atilgan D, Tukel Y. Sports College Students and Entrepreneurship: An Investigation into Entrepreneurship Tendencies. International Education Studies. 2021;14(6):71-81.
  11. Ayob AH. Institutions and student entrepreneurship: the effects of economic conditions, culture and education. Educational Studies. 2021;47(6):661-79.
  12. Azimi Delarestaghi A, Razavi SMH, Boroumand MR. Identifying the effective context conditions of strategic entrepreneurship deployment in sports business. Sport Management and Development. 2019;7(4):70-87.
  13. Bodolica V, Spraggon M, Badi H. Extracurricular activities and social entrepreneurial leadership of graduating youth in universities from the Middle East. The International Journal of Management Education. 2021;19(2):100489.
  14. Boldureanu G, Ionescu AM, Bercu A-M, Bedrule-Grigoruță MV, Boldureanu D. Entrepreneurship education through successful entrepreneurial models in higher education institutions. Sustainability. 2020;12(3):1267.
  15. Chen C-Y, Lin Y-H. Social entrepreneurship in professional sports: antecedents and outcomes from the consumer perspective. Sustainability. 2021;13(3):1045.
  16. Fragoso R, Rocha-Junior W, Xavier A. Determinant factors of entrepreneurial intention among university students in Brazil and Portugal. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship. 2020;32(1):33-57.
  17. Frolova Y, Alwaely SA, Nikishina O. Knowledge management in entrepreneurship education as the basis for creative business development. Sustainability. 2021;13(3):1167.
  18. Hahn D, Minola T, Bosio G, Cassia L. The impact of entrepreneurship education on university students’ entrepreneurial skills: a family embeddedness perspective. Small Business Economics. 2020;55(1):257-82.
  19. Hassan HK. Intention towards social entrepreneurship of university students in an emerging economy: the influence of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurship education. On the Horizon. 2020.
  20. Hemme F, Morais DG, Bowers MT, Todd JS. Extending sport-based entrepreneurship theory through phenomenological inquiry. Sport management review. 2017;20(1):92-104.
  21. Honari H, Mandalizadeh Z. Framework of Developing and Explaining an Entrepreneurship Mission Statement in Sport of Iran from the View Point of Sport Experts. Applied Research in Sport Management. 2013;2(1):49-61.
  22. Hosieni E, Moradi Barzal Abad F, Bazdi Langari M, Maleki A, Shooshinasab P. Identification and Prioritization barriers to entrepreneurship in sport using a combination DEMATEL and network analysis process (ANP). journal of motor and behavioral sciences. 2020;3(2):177-86.
  23. Iazzolino G, Coniglio IM, Verteramo S, Giglio C. University students and entrepreneurship: An empirical analysis on Italian Universities. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. 2019;22(5):1-16.
  24. Iwu CG, Opute PA, Nchu R, Eresia-Eke C, Tengeh RK, Jaiyeoba O, et al. Entrepreneurship education, curriculum and lecturer-competency as antecedents of student entrepreneurial intention. The International Journal of Management Education. 2021;19(1):100295.
  25. Jafarzadeh Zarandi M, Razaghi ME, Mirza Akbari A. The IT position in the development of entrepreneurship opportunities in sport. Communication Management in Sport Media. 2019;6(4):15-28.
  26. Jones P, Jones A. Attitudes of Sports Development and Sports Management undergraduate students towards entrepreneurship: A university perspective towards best practice. Education+ Training. 2014.
  27. Keshavarz L, Mehri Shandi S. Analysis of the Barriers to Entrepreneurship in Sport from the Perspective of MA Students of physical education and sport sciences at the University of Tehran. Applied Research in Sport Management. 2021;9(4):163-9.
  28. Lerner DA, Verheul I, Thurik R. Entrepreneurship and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a large-scale study involving the clinical condition of ADHD. Small Business Economics. 2019;53(2):381-92.
  29. Liñán F, Rodríguez-Cohard JC, Rueda-Cantuche JM. Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels: a role for education. International entrepreneurship and management Journal. 2011;7(2):195-218.
  30. Lu G, Song Y, Pan B. How university entrepreneurship support affects college students’ entrepreneurial intentions: an empirical analysis from China. Sustainability. 2021;13(6):3224.
  31. Margaça C, Hernández-Sánchez B, Sánchez-García JC, Cardella GM. The roles of psychological capital and gender in university students’ entrepreneurial intentions. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021:3847.
  32. Mohamadkazemi R, Zaffarian R, Khodayari A, Javadinia M. Identifying Entrepreneurial Business Opportunities in Sports Industry with an IT Approach. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development. 2014;7(1):95-112.
  33. Rippa P, Ferruzzi G, Holienka M, Capaldo G, Coduras A. What drives university engineering students to become entrepreneurs? Finding different recipes using a configuration approach. Journal of Small Business Management. 2020:1-31.
  34. Ziviar F, Farahani A, Keshavarz L. Identification of structural Obstacles to Organizational Entrepreneurship in the Ministry of Sport and Youth. Organizational Culture Management. 2017;15(1):187-205.
  35. Shabani zangeneh F, Hosseini R, Safari M. Designing a Quality Assessment Model with Academic Entrepreneurship Development Approach. Journal of Research in Educational Science. 2020;14(50):163-89.
  36. Shirokova G, Osiyevskyy O, Bogatyreva K. Exploring the intention–behavior link in student entrepreneurship: Moderating effects of individual and environmental characteristics. European Management Journal. 2016;34(4):386-99.
  37. Zhao J, Wei G, Chen K-H, Yien J-M. Psychological Capital and university students’ entrepreneurial intention in china: mediation effect of entrepreneurial capitals. Frontiers in psychology. 2020;10:2984.