نوع مقاله : مقاله مستقل

نویسندگان

1 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، ایران.

2 کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت ورزش، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، ایران.

10.22044/shm.2022.11558.2430

چکیده

هدف: هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی تاثیر رهبری تحول‌آفرین بر عملکرد شغلی معلمان تربیت‌بدنی با نقش میانجی هویت، اشتیاق کاری و تعدیل گری شخصیت فعال بود.

روش‌شناسی: این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی ـ همبستگی بود. داده‌ها از 208 معلم تربیت‌بدنی که به روش نمونه گیری در دسترس انتخاب شده بودند، جمع‌آوری شد. ابزار مورداستفاده در این تحقیق پرسشنامه بود که روایی و پایایی آن نیز مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها، از روش معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد.

یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد رهبری تحول‌آفرین بر عملکرد شغلی، اشتیاق کاری و هویت‌سازمانی تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد و متغیرهای اشتیاق کاری و هویت‌سازمانی نیز بر عملکرد شغلی تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارند همچنین شخصیت فعال بر اشتیاق کاری و هویت‌سازمانی تاثیر مثبت و معناداری داشته اما نقش تعدیل گر در رابطه بین رهبری تحول‌آفرین با هویت‌سازمانی و اشتیاق کاری ندارد. علاوه بر این اشتیاق کاری نقش میانجی و هویت‌سازمانی عدم میانجی در رابطه بین رهبری تحول‌آفرین با عملکرد شغلی دارند.

نتیجه‌گیری: مدیران سازمانی با سبک رهبری تحول آفرین می‌توانند در کارکنان اشتیاق و هویت ایجاد نموده و عملکرد آن‌ها را برای دستیابی به نتایج پیش‌بینی‌شده و قابل‌توجه ترغیب کنند همچنین معلمانی که دارای شخصیت فعال هستند بیشتر تعلق به کار خود داشته و به سازمان نیز هویت می‌بخشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

  1. Ehrnrooth M, Barner‐Rasmussen W, Koveshnikov A, Törnroos M. A new look at the relationships between transformational leadership and employee attitudes—Does a high‐performance work system substitute and/or enhance these relationships? Hum Resour Manage. 2021;60(3):377–98.
  2. Decuypere A, Schaufeli W. Exploring the Leadership–Engagement Nexus: A Moderated Meta-Analysis and Review of Explaining Mechanisms. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8592.
  3. López-Cabarcos MÁ, Vázquez-Rodríguez P, Quiñoá-Piñeiro LM. An approach to employees’ job performance through work environmental variables and leadership behaviours. J Bus Res. 2022;140:361–9.
  4. Findawati Y, Taurusta C, Widiaty I, Nandiyanto ABD. Teacher performance assesment application using naive bayes classifier method. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing; 2018. p. 12047.
  5. Mirbagheri SM, Rafiyi Artani A, Dashti R. Introducing a Model for Managing Personnel Performance in Military Research Centers. Def Stud. 2019;17(2):97–130.(persian)
  6. Diamantidis AD, Chatzoglou P. Factors affecting employee performance: an empirical approach. Int J Product Perform Manag. 2019;68(1):171–93.
  7. Masale R, Barkhuizen EN, Schutte NE, van der Sluis L. Relating job satisfaction and organisational commitment: The moderating and mediating roles of positive individual strengths. SA J Ind Psychol. 2021;47(1):1–12.
  8. Men LR, Stacks DW. The impact of leadership style and employee empowerment on perceived organizational reputation. J Commun Manag. 2013;
  9. Kotamena F, Senjaya P, Prasetya AB. A Literature Review: Is Transformational Leadership Elitist and Antidemocratic? Int J Soc POLICY LAW. 2020;1(1):36–43.
  10. Novitasari D, Siswanto E, Purwanto A, Fahmi K. Authentic Leadership and Innovation: What is the Role of Psychological Capital? Int J Soc Manag Stud. 2020;1(1):1–21.
  11. Irshad M, Bashir S. The dark side of organizational identification: a multi-study investigation of negative outcomes. Front Psychol. 2020;2521.
  12. Ngo H, Loi R, Foley S, Zheng X, Zhang L. Perceptions of organizational context and job attitudes: The mediating effect of organizational identification. Asia pacific J Manag. 2013;30(1):149–68.
  13. Hassani M, Bahadori R, Kazemzadehbeytali M. Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Organizational Identity with Organizational Entrepreneurship among the Faculty Members of Tabriz University. J Entrep Dev. 2016;9(3):433–52. (persian)
  14. Herman HM, Chiu WCK. Transformational leadership and job performance: A social identity perspective. J Bus Res. 2014;67(1):2827–35.
  15. Fürstenberg N, Alfes K, Kearney E. How and when paradoxical leadership benefits work engagement: The role of goal clarity and work autonomy. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2021;
  16. Bakker AB, Leiter M. Strategic and proactive approaches to work engagement. Organ Dyn. 2017;46(2):67–75.
  17. Nurtjahjani F, Batilmurik RW, Puspita AF, Fanggidae JP. The relationship between transformational leadership and work engagement. Moderated mediation roles of psychological ownership and belief in just world. Organ Manag J. 2021;
  18. Mubarak N, Khan J, Yasmin R, Osmadi A. The impact of a proactive personality on innovative work behavior: the role of work engagement and transformational leadership. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2021;42(7):989–1003.
  19. Chua J, Ayoko OB. Employees’ self-determined motivation, transformational leadership and work engagement. J Manag Organ. 2021;27(3):523–43.
  20. Kivaj ME, Janani H, ..., Ekrami Kivaj M, Janani H, Barghi Moghadam J, et al. Develop a transformational leadership model and job performance with the moderating role of the proactive persolanity in country, s football staff. Razi J … [Internet]. 2020;27:197–208. Available from: http://rjms.iums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-5626-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1. (persian)
  21. Thomas JP, Whitman DS, Viswesvaran C. Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta‐analysis of emergent proactive constructs. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2010;83(2):275–300.
  22. Fuller Jr B, Marler LE. Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. J Vocat Behav. 2009;75(3):329–45.
  23. Kanten P, Ulker FE. A relational approach among perceived organizational support, proactive personality and voice behaviour. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 2012;62:1016–22.
  24. Anggraini AL, Rosyihuddin M, Desembrianita E. THE EFFECT OF A TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP STYLE ON WORK ENGAGEMENT WITH WORK SATISFACTION AS INTERVENING VARIABLES IN K3PG. Media Mahard. 2021;19(3):548–59.
  25. Rabiul MK, Yean TF. Leadership styles, motivating language, and work engagement: An empirical investigation of the hotel industry. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021;92:102712.
  26. Sahu S, Pathardikar A, Kumar A. Transformational leadership and turnover: Mediating effects of employee engagement, employer branding, and psychological attachment. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2017;39(1):82–99.
  27. Chang C-M, Hsieh H-H, Chou Y-H, Huang H-C. The Relationship between Physical Education Teachers’ Perceptions of Principals’ Transformational Leadership and Creative Teaching Behavior at Junior and Senior High Schools: A Cross-Level Moderating Effect on Innovative School Climates. Sustainability. 2021;13(15):8184.
  28. Khan H, Rehmat M, Butt TH, Farooqi S, Asim J. Impact of transformational leadership on work performance, burnout and social loafing: a mediation model. Futur Bus J. 2020;6(1):1–13.
  29. Holten A-L, Bøllingtoft A, Carneiro IG, Borg V. A within-country study of leadership perceptions and outcomes across native and immigrant employees: Questioning the universality of transformational leadership. J Manag Organ. 2018;24(1):145–62.
  30. Rajabi Farjad H, Farkhojaste V. The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Job Performance with Roles of Identity and Job Involvement. Career Organ Couns. 2021; .(persian)
  31. Bergeron DM, Schroeder TD, Martinez HA. Proactive personality at work: Seeing more to do and doing more? J Bus Psychol. 2014;29(1):71–86.
  32. Wei Z, Li C-J, Li F, Chen T. How proactive personality affects psychological strain and job performance: The moderating role of leader–member exchange. Pers Individ Dif. 2021;179(9):110910.
  33. Buil I, Martínez E, Matute J. Transformational leadership and employee performance: The role of identification, engagement and proactive personality. Int J Hosp Manag. 2019;77:64–75.
  34. Drown DT. Work Design Characteristics as Moderators of the Relationship between Proactive Personality and Engagement. Portland State University; 2013.
  35. Ataei M, Alinezhad A, Rahmany N. The Relationship between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Human Resource Productivity (Case Study). J Dev Evol Mnagement. 2015;1394(21):1–81.(persian)
  36. Beara M, Petrović DS. Study on Teacher Education and Training (Continuous Professional Development) Needs Analysis Systems in South Eastern Europe, Belgrade: Education Reform Initiative of South Eastern Europe-ERI SEE. Research report; 2020.
  37. Zarinpar AR. Comparing the Effectiveness of Teachers Employed through Examination and those Trained and Committed to Teaching. Q J Educ. 2019;34(4):137–52. (persian)
  38. Ghasemy M, Teeroovengadum V, Becker JM, Ringle CM. This fast car can move faster: a review of PLS-SEM application in higher education research. High Educ. 2020;80(6):1121–52.
  39. PURWANTO A, Purba JT, Bernarto I, Sijabat R. Effect of Transformational Leadership, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitments on Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Inovbiz J Inov Bisnis. 2021;9(1):61.
  40. Shabaninejad H, Alyari A, Abolghasem Gorji H. Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Job Performance in Farabi Hospital, Iran. J Heal Adm. 2016;19(65):22–30. (persian)
  41. Lowe KB, Kroeck KG, Sivasubramaniam N. Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadersh Q. 1996;7(3):385–425.
  42. Lu X, Xie B, Guo Y. The trickle-down of work engagement from leader to follower: The roles of optimism and self-efficacy. J Bus Res. 2018;84:186–95.